The clock tower in winter
My first three months as Assistant Gardener at Uppark have flown by. Although I had some idea of what I was getting myself into I’m amazed at the variety of tasks and projects that I’ve become involved in.
One of the more unexpected jobs that the garden team take care of is winding the clock at the top of the East Pavilion. Jo, Alan and Rae have all helped initiate me in the routine maintenance of the clock mechanism. This is a weekly ritual that must have taken place since the 1750s (albeit with occasional gaps) While winding away (it’s easier if you’re a bit distracted) it occurred to me that the clock had chimed its way through centuries of change in the garden.
I’ve become fascinated by what the garden at Uppark was like in the past and how it has evolved over the centuries. Although I sadly can’t hop in a time machine, I’ve really enjoyed learning about the history of the garden by going on tours given by David, Julian and Bob, and by reading up as much as I can (particularly the Garden Conservation Statement by Dr Sarah Rutherford). While I’m definitely not an expert on garden history, this is what I’ve found out so far:
1703
The earliest known image of the garden shows a very structured and formal layout. While we don’t know how accurately the image represents the garden at the time, it is typical of gardens of the era, which were influenced by the formal royal gardens in France.
While there is little trace of this layout, it is a tantalising thought that some evidence of this layout (particularly the East Drive) may still exist beneath the present garden.
1720s– 1730s
While we don’t have much information about what was going on in the garden at Uppark at this time, there was a gradual transition towards a Classical Arcadian style of gardening. This meant informal pleasure grounds which highlighted and manipulated ‘nature’ and featured increasing numbers of classical references.
An image that we do have from this period suggests a mixture of formality and informality. There are straight avenues, but little to suggest the rigid square layout of Kip’s 1703 print. You can see this print in the ‘flower room’ in the house.
1740s
In the 1740s and into the 1750s, Rococo gardens featured Classical, Gothic, and Chinese influences to form complex gardens which could be ‘read’ like paintings or literature. They often featured a circular route so that different features of the garden were gradually revealed.
Again, there seems little to suggest this kind of garden at Uppark. A sale document from 1746 has been interpreted by Dr Sarah Rutherford to show: “Rectangular garden north of house, mount in pleasure ground to north-east of this, apsidal boundary to north flanked by woodland.”
It is certainly different to the garden we see now, although features like the mound are visible.
1750s – 1780s
After Sir Matthew Featherstonhaugh bought Uppark in 1746, significant changes were made to the garden by Lancelot ‘Capability’ Brown.
Generally Brown is known for his ‘natural’ style of landscaping (in contrast to the more flamboyant Rococo style) and for creating large aesthetically pleasing parklands.
However, Uppark does not seem to have had a parkland. Dr Rutherford has described Uppark as:
“an unusual example of a discrete Brown pleasure ground designed in isolation from a large park design.”
It is striking from the plan that the boundary line of the garden seems similar to the current flint boundary wall. The big mound (near the current golden gates) and the smaller mound (currently the site of the Gothick Seat) are visible. There’s also a suggestion of ‘paths meandering’ through the pleasure grounds.
While Uppark was not Brown’s biggest commission, it seems that he would have employed the same techniques he used on larger projects. This would have included creating carefully orchestrated views for the garden’s users to explore and enjoy.
I’ve scratched the surface of the fascinating garden history of Uppark. In my next post I’ll explore the more recent developments in the garden.